Equity Management
Equity Management Comparison
How to compare equity management products: the capabilities we check against each vendor’s own documentation, and the products verified so far.
LeadChange may earn a fee when you request pricing through our site or follow a sponsored link. Rankings never depend on whether a vendor pays us.We may earn a fee.
How we make money
LeadChange may earn a fee when you request pricing through our site or follow a sponsored link. Rankings never depend on whether a vendor pays us.
What we compare
No equity management product is verified yet. These are the capabilities each one will be checked against, in the vendor’s own documentation.
Capabilities in the comparison
Cap table ledger
Records shares, options and other securities with every transaction.
Grant administration
Issues and records option and stock grants with approval records.
Vesting schedules
Applies vesting, cliffs and acceleration, including leaves and terminations.
Exercise processing
Handles option exercises and links them to payroll and tax data.
Equity tax reporting
Produces data for equity-related tax forms such as Form 3921 and Form 3922.
Round and exit modeling
Models financing rounds, dilution and exit waterfalls.
Valuation support
Provides or links fair market value valuations to grants.
Employee equity portal
Shows holders their grants, vesting and exercise options.
HRIS and payroll integration
Syncs hires, terminations and exercises with HR and payroll.
Audit trail and export
Logs changes and exports the full ledger and documents.
How to choose equity management software
The cap table is a legal record, so accuracy and auditability come first. Features for modeling and employee education only help if the underlying ledger is right.
Bring your current cap table and a few real grants to the demo, and ask the vendor to show a grant from board approval through vesting, exercise and the related tax form.
Cap table accuracy and ledger detail
Investors, auditors and acquirers rely on the cap table, and errors are costly to fix later.
Grant and vesting administration
Vesting schedules, cliffs, acceleration and leaves of absence must be applied consistently for every holder.
Exercise workflows and tax forms
Exercises trigger payroll and tax reporting, such as Form 3921 for incentive stock options.
Securities compliance support
Private companies granting equity rely on exemptions such as Rule 701, which has disclosure requirements above a sales threshold.
Valuation support
Option exercise prices are usually set with reference to a fair market value, so valuation records must be linked to grants.
Scenario and round modeling
Founders and finance need to see dilution and payouts before a financing or exit.
Requirements by company size
Small businesses
- Accurate cap table with share classes
- Simple grant and vesting tracking
- Low cost for few stakeholders
Watch out for
- Pricing that jumps with the number of stakeholders
- Features for venture-backed companies you will not use
- Weak export if you switch later
Mid-sized companies
- Grant workflows with board approval records
- Exercise processing linked to payroll
- Tax form data for equity events
Watch out for
- Manual handoff of exercises to payroll
- Valuation sold separately at a high price
- Employees left without clear vesting information
Enterprises
- Multiple plans, share classes and countries
- Audit-ready reporting and controls
- Integration with payroll, HRIS and finance
Watch out for
- Limited support for international grants and local tax rules
- Migration risk at a public-company transition
- Separate contracts for plan administration and brokerage
Red flags
- The ledger cannot be reconciled to board approvals and legal documents
- No audit trail of changes to grants or holdings
- Exercises are processed without a link to payroll or tax reporting
- Vesting changes for leaves and terminations require manual edits
- No full data export
How we research
Ranked by the LeadChange Score, computed only from verified facts: capability coverage (30%), pricing and value (20%), integrations and API (15%), security (15%), fit and support (10%) and data confidence (10%), times a category fit. Products with too few verified facts are not scored yet and come last. Payment never changes a score or a position.
Facts, not impressions
Every input is a fact verified against vendors’ official documentation, with the date we last checked it.
Missing data is never assumed
Unverified items are left out of the score and lower its coverage; below 60% coverage a product is not scored yet.
Independent of revenue
Rankings never depend on whether a vendor pays us.
Get your equity management shortlist
Tell us about your team and get a shortlist ranked without regard to who pays us.