Independent research on 125 HR & workforce products. Facts checked against vendors’ official documentation.

We may earn a referral fee. We may earn a referral feeHow we make money

Talent Acquisition

The Best Applicant Tracking Systems of 2026

A shortlist of applicant tracking systems ranked from verified product data, so you can compare workflow, job distribution, compliance features and real pricing instead of vendor claims. Every score traces back to a fact we checked against vendor documentation and public sources.

products compared
14
with a published score
11
last updated
See the ranking

LeadChange may earn a fee when you request pricing through our site or follow a sponsored link. Rankings never depend on whether a vendor pays us.We may earn a fee.

Our top picks

  1. Best overall

    Highest LeadChange Score here (9.4/10), with 12 of 12 core applicant tracking capabilities verified.

    From $299/mo

  2. Best for small businesses

    Breezy HR

    by Breezy HR, Inc.

    Highest score among products that list small businesses as a target segment, with pricing and fit weighted more.

    From $157/mo (Startup plan)

  3. Best for enterprises

    Ashby

    by Ashby, Inc.

    Highest score among products that list enterprises as a target segment, with security and integrations weighted more.

    From $300/mo

LeadChange Score: editorial assessment based on public information.

Applicant Tracking Systems ranked by LeadChange Score

Ranked by LeadChange Score from verified facts; products with too few verified facts are not scored yet and come last. Prices are list prices as published by each vendor.

Filter by verified facts

  1. Workable

    Best for Small and mid-size teams that hire often and post to 200+ job boards at once

    Workable fits small and mid-size employers that hire often and want job posting, screening and AI sourcing in one tool, with prices published by company size. HR is a second product with its own price, or a bundle with Recruiting.

    Pricing model
    Tiered plans
    SOC 2 Type II
    Yes

    From $299/mo

  2. Breezy HR

    Best for Small and midsize teams that hire regularly and want a flat monthly price

    Breezy HR suits small and midsize companies that want a full ATS at a flat monthly price, not per user. Bootstrap is free for one open role; Startup costs $157, Growth $273 and Business $439 a month billed annually, or $189, $329 and $529 billed monthly. Users are unlimited and jobs post to 50+ boards.

    Pricing model
    Tiered plans
    SOC 2 Type II
    Yes

    From $157/mo (Startup plan)

  3. Ashby

    Best for Startups and scale-ups that hire continuously and source outbound

    Ashby suits fast-growing companies that want one recruiting system for applicant tracking, outbound sourcing, CRM, scheduling and analytics, priced by company size rather than per recruiter seat. Foundations costs $300 a month for 1–10 employees up to $900 for 76–100, with 10% off annual commitments.

    Pricing model
    Tiered plans
    SOC 2 Type II
    Yes

    From $300/mo

  4. Recruitee (Tellent)

    Best for Growing teams that want collaborative hiring with evaluation forms and shared notes

    Recruitee, branded Tellent Recruitee, is a collaborative applicant tracking system with three plans, AI screening and matching tools, SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 assurance, and EEO and GDPR tooling. Plan prices are not published.

    Pricing model
    Quote only
    SOC 2 Type II
    Yes
  5. Greenhouse

    Best for Hiring teams running structured interviews with kits and scorecards

    Greenhouse fits hiring teams that want structured interviews, a sourcing CRM and audited security in one applicant tracking system, from early-stage companies to enterprises. Prices are by quote only, and texting, sourcing automation, the audit log and the developer sandbox sit in higher plans.

    Pricing model
    Quote only
    SOC 2 Type II
    Yes
  6. Lever

    Best for Recruiting teams that source and nurture passive candidates, not only post jobs

    Lever fits recruiting teams that want an ATS and a candidate CRM in one place, so sourcing, nurture emails and texts, interviews and offers live on one candidate record. AI screens and ranks applicants, and every interview gets an AI transcript and summary. Security is well documented, with SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001.

    Pricing model
    Quote only
    SOC 2 Type II
    Yes
  7. SmartRecruiters

    Best for Corporate employers with 50+ employees

    SmartRecruiters fits corporate employers with at least 50 employees and many open requisitions that want applicant tracking, CRM, SMS, job distribution, scheduling and onboarding in one suite, with the Winston AI hiring agent on higher plans. Part of SAP SuccessFactors, it holds SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001:2022.

    Pricing model
    Quote only
    SOC 2 Type II
    Yes
  8. iCIMS

    Best for Enterprises hiring at high volume or across many countries

    iCIMS fits large employers with high-volume or global hiring that need a configurable ATS, a recruiting CRM, text recruiting, career sites and onboarding from one vendor. It connects with more than 800 partner technologies, holds SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001, and has AI agents for sourcing and matching.

    Pricing model
    Quote only
    SOC 2 Type II
    Yes
Show all 14 products
  1. Teamtailor6.2/10 · Medium confidenceTeamtailor plans and prices
  2. BambooHR6.0/10 · High confidenceFrom $250/mo flat up to 25 employees, then $10.25/employee/moBambooHR plans and prices
  3. Jobvite5.0/10 · Medium confidenceJobvite plans and prices
  4. JazzHRNot scored yet (13 of 26 facts verified)From $1,000/yr (Hero plan)JazzHR pricing
  5. PaycomNot scored yet (12 of 26 facts verified)Paycom pricing
  6. isolved People CloudNot scored yet (5 of 26 facts verified)What isolved People Cloud costs

LeadChange Score: editorial assessment based on public information.

How the score works

Find your fit

Compare the top 8 side by side

Applicant Tracking Systems comparison: LeadChange Score, pricing and verified features
ProductScorePricing modelOpen APISOC 2 Type IIMobile appsCareer site builderISO 27001Webhooks
Workable9.4Tiered plansiOS, Android
Breezy HR9.0Tiered plansiOS, AndroidNot verified
Ashby8.1Tiered plansNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verified
Recruitee (Tellent)7.3Quote onlyTellent Recruitee mobile app
Greenhouse6.7Quote onlyiOS, Android
Lever6.7Quote onlyNot verifiedNot verified
SmartRecruiters6.7Quote onlyNot verifiedNot verified
iCIMS6.2Quote onlyNot verifiedNot verified

Applicant tracking system comparison

Pricing at a glance

Monthly list cost from each vendor’s published base and per-employee prices, before discounts.

  • 10 employees

    $157–$300/mo

    Median $275/mo

    Published list prices of 4 products at 10 employees

  • 50 employees

    $157–$513/mo

    Median $300/mo

    Published list prices of 4 products at 50 employees

  • 200 employees

    $157–$2,050/mo

    Median $300/mo

    Published list prices of 4 products at 200 employees

Per user per month
A monthly fee for each recruiter or hiring manager seat. Costs rise as more managers need access.
Per job posting
A fee for each active job or posting, common for small employers with few openings. Costs rise with volume.
Tiered by company size
Plans tied to employee count or number of open jobs. Check where your headcount sits relative to tier limits.
Freemium
A free plan with limits on jobs, users or features. Paid job-board postings are usually separate.
Custom quote9 of 14 products
Enterprise pricing based on hires, modules and implementation scope.

Applicant tracking system pricing

How to choose applicant tracking systems

An ATS is used daily by recruiters, hiring managers and candidates, so ease of use and process fit decide success. Choose for how well it models your hiring workflow and keeps a defensible record.

Run a trial with a real open role: post it, receive test applications, schedule an interview and generate a report of source and stage data.

  1. Workflow and stage configuration

    Different roles need different stages, scorecards and approvals, and rigid pipelines push work back to spreadsheets.

  2. Job distribution and sourcing

    Posting reach drives applicant volume, and duplicate manual posting wastes time.

  3. Candidate experience and mobile apply

    Long or non-mobile applications lose candidates, especially for hourly roles.

  4. Collaboration and scheduling

    Hiring managers need to review candidates and book interviews without email chains.

  5. Records, retention and audit trail

    Personnel and hiring records must be kept for one year, longer when a charge is filed, so the system must preserve and let you hold records.

  6. Adverse impact and EEO reporting

    Federal guidelines say users of selection procedures should keep information showing their impact by race, sex and ethnic group, and a selection rate below four-fifths of the highest group's rate is generally treated as evidence of adverse impact.

Requirements by company size

  • Small businesses

    • Free or low-cost job posting and a branded careers page
    • Simple pipeline and interview scheduling
    • Mobile-friendly apply flow

    Watch out for

    • Job-board costs billed separately from the subscription
    • Per-job pricing that rises with each open role
    • Limits on users, active jobs or stored candidates
  • Mid-sized companies

    • Requisition approvals and configurable workflows
    • Reporting on source, time to hire and stage conversion
    • Native HRIS, background check and onboarding connections

    Watch out for

    • Integrations gated by pricing tier
    • Rigid workflows that require vendor services to change
    • Candidate data trapped when you switch
  • Enterprises

    • Multi-country, multi-entity configuration and access controls
    • Compliance, audit and adverse impact reporting
    • High-volume handling and a mature API

    Watch out for

    • Long implementations tied to workflow design
    • AI screening features without audit documentation
    • Services fees for each change request

Red flags

  • The vendor cannot explain what its automated screening or ranking does with candidate data.
  • Self-identification data is visible to reviewers during screening.
  • No bulk export of candidates, notes and attachments is offered.
  • Job posting costs and per-job fees are not stated in writing.
  • There is no way to apply retention periods or place a hold on records.

All comparisons

Popular alternatives

Integrations for applicant tracking systems

Apps with documented integrations across the products ranked on this page.

Most integrated apps

Learn

Glossary

All buying guides

Frequently asked questions

What is an applicant tracking system?

An applicant tracking system is software that manages hiring from job posting to offer. It stores applications, moves candidates through stages, schedules interviews and keeps a record of decisions. Recruiters and hiring managers use it as a shared source of truth and for hiring reports.

Do I need an ATS if I only hire a few people a year?

Often not. A shared inbox and spreadsheet can work for occasional hiring if you keep records consistent. An ATS becomes worthwhile when several roles are open at once, many people review candidates, or you need reporting. Remember hiring records must be kept for at least one year.

How long do I have to keep applicant records?

Federal EEOC rules require employers to keep personnel and employment records, including hiring records, for one year from the date the record was made or the personnel action taken. If a discrimination charge is filed, relevant records must be preserved until final disposition. State or contractor rules may be longer.

Can an ATS cause discrimination problems?

Yes, if screening rules or automated ranking disadvantage protected groups. Federal guidelines treat a selection rate below four-fifths of the highest group's rate as generally evidence of adverse impact. Review selection rates by stage, and ask vendors how automated features work.

What is the difference between an ATS and a recruiting CRM?

An ATS manages active applications for specific openings. A recruiting CRM builds and nurtures talent pools before roles open. Many platforms offer both. Choose an ATS first if your problem is processing applicants, and add CRM features when proactive sourcing matters.

Is an applicant tracking system worth it?

It is worth it when you cannot track candidates, hiring managers wait on updates, or you need reporting and consistent records. It is less justified for rare hiring. Estimate recruiter hours spent on admin and applications lost, and compare against the subscription.

What is the best applicant tracking system?

Workable has the highest LeadChange Score of the 14 products in our ranking, 9.4 out of 10, ahead of Breezy HR (9.0) and Ashby (8.1). Workable's score rests on 25 of 26 checks verified from public sources. 3 more products are listed without a score until enough of their data is public.

Which applicant tracking systems in our ranking integrate with Indeed?

Indeed, listed by 7 of the 14 applicant tracking systems in our ranking: BambooHR, Breezy HR, JazzHR, Jobvite, Lever, and 2 more.

How long does it take to implement applicant tracking systems?

Vendors in our ranking that publish a typical timeline: Ashby, data migration from Greenhouse or Lever in a day or two; BambooHR, 4–6 weeks; Lever, within weeks, not months; Paycom, most organizations are implemented within three months.

Which applicant tracking systems in our ranking are built for enterprises?

Ashby, Greenhouse, iCIMS, isolved People Cloud, Jobvite, and 5 more list enterprises among the company sizes they serve.

How we research

Ranked by the LeadChange Score, computed only from verified facts: capability coverage (30%), pricing and value (20%), integrations and API (15%), security (15%), fit and support (10%) and data confidence (10%), times a category fit. Products with too few verified facts are not scored yet and come last. Payment never changes a score or a position.

  • Facts, not impressions

    Every input is a fact verified against vendors’ official documentation, with the date we last checked it.

  • Missing data is never assumed

    Unverified items are left out of the score and lower its coverage; below 60% coverage a product is not scored yet.

  • Independent of revenue

    Rankings never depend on whether a vendor pays us.

Get your applicant tracking systems shortlist

Tell us about your team and get a shortlist ranked without regard to who pays us.

What the LeadChange Score means

A 0–10 editorial assessment built only from verified facts, across six weighted dimensions: capabilities, pricing, integrations, security, fit and support, and data confidence.

Payments, commissions and lead fees are never inputs.