Ashby publishes a $400 per month Foundations plan for companies up to 100 employees on monthly terms, while Greenhouse sells Core, Plus, and Pro by quote only. Greenhouse lists 449 integrations against Ashby's 250 or more and adds an onboarding module and ISO 27001.
| Attribute | Ashby | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Tiered plans | Quote only |
| Price transparency | Partly published | Quote only |
| Single sign-on | SAML, OIDC | SSO (protocols not specified) |
| Native integrations | 250 | 449 |
| Attribute | Ashby | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Small businesses, mid-market companies, enterprises | Small businesses, mid-market companies, enterprises |
| Open API | ||
| Webhooks | ||
| SCIM provisioning | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| GDPR program |
Pricing. Ashby publishes Foundations at $400 per month (up to 100 employees), monthly term, with custom Plus and Enterprise tiers and priced add-ons. Greenhouse publishes no prices for Core, Plus, or Pro.
Capabilities. Ashby documents requisitions, scheduling, offers with e-signature, EEO reporting, and audit logging. We could confirm fewer Greenhouse capabilities on its public pages, which does not mean the features are missing. Greenhouse adds onboarding, voice AI interviewing, and fraud detection.
Integrations. Greenhouse lists 449 native integrations; Ashby lists 250. Both offer an open API. Ashby also documents webhooks and Workday, Zapier, and Slack connections.
Security. Both document SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and SCIM. Greenhouse also documents ISO 27001; Ashby documents SAML and OIDC SSO, while Greenhouse does not specify its SSO protocols. We could not confirm ISO 27001 for Ashby on its public pages.
Only Ashby publishes a price: Foundations is $400 per month for companies up to 100 employees, with a 10 percent discount for annual commitment. Greenhouse prices Core, Plus and Pro by quote with no published rates, so we cannot say which costs less. Ashby also charges for add-ons such as advanced scheduling and the AI notetaker; prices are not published.
Both list small business among their target segments. Ashby is the easier one to budget: its Foundations plan is aimed at companies up to 100 employees and is priced publicly. Greenhouse offers Core, Plus, and Pro tiers but requires a quote, so small teams should request pricing before shortlisting it.
Neither vendor documents migration tooling or a timeline in either direction. Both provide APIs: Ashby an RPC API with webhooks, Greenhouse the Harvest API among others. Ask each vendor what candidate, job, and scorecard history can be exported or imported, and whether data is carried over.
Pricing transparency and scale of the ecosystem. Ashby publishes an entry price and month-to-month terms and bundles ATS, CRM, scheduling, and analytics. Greenhouse keeps pricing private, lists 449 integrations, and adds onboarding, voice AI interviewing, and ISO 27001. We could not confirm Greenhouse's capability depth beyond this on its public pages.
Greenhouse lists Checkr as a marketplace partner, and Checkr lists Greenhouse as a native integration. The Ashby integrations we reviewed name Workday, Zapier, and Slack but not Checkr, so we cannot confirm a connection. Check Ashby's integrations page before assuming support.
Share your headcount and needs once; both vendors can quote for your situation.
LeadChange may earn a fee when you request pricing through our site or follow a sponsored link. Rankings are computed without knowing which vendors pay us.
How we make money
LeadChange may earn a fee when you request pricing through our site or follow a sponsored link. Rankings are computed without knowing which vendors pay us.
First published.
Every value on this page links to its source below. Primary sources are the vendor's or authority's own pages.
