Ashby vs Greenhouse

The short answer

Ashby publishes its Foundations price by company size, from $300 a month for 1–10 employees, and quotes Plus and Enterprise. Greenhouse publishes no prices; every plan leads to a demo. Ashby bundles ATS, sourcing, CRM, scheduling and analytics and migrates data from Greenhouse or Lever in a day or two.

By LeadChange Research TeamUpdated Oct 13, 2026Facts checked Oct 12, 2026

Ashby

Starting price: $300/mo
Best for: Startups and scale-ups that hire continuously and source outbound

Choose Ashby if

You want a published price: Foundations starts at $300 a month for 1–10 employees.
You want sourcing, CRM, scheduling and analytics in one product.
You are moving from Greenhouse or Lever: Ashby migrates that data in a day or two.
You want monthly terms, with 10% off for an annual commitment.

Ashby plans and prices Ashby ATS alternatives

Greenhouse

Best for: Hiring teams running structured interviews with kits and scorecards

Choose Greenhouse if

You connect many tools: Greenhouse counts 451 partner listings.
You want onboarding from the same vendor as your ATS.
You want candidate identity verification and fraud detection.
You need SCIM provisioning and ISO 27001 certification.

Greenhouse plans and prices Greenhouse ATS alternatives

LeadChange Score: editorial assessment based on public information.

Scorecard

Ashby wins 1Greenhouse wins 21 tie

Ashby vs Greenhouse by dimension
Dimension	Ashby	Greenhouse
PricingAshby publishes Foundations by company size, from $300 a month for 1–10 employees, and prices extra texting at $90 per 1,000 messages. Greenhouse quotes every plan by hiring volume and features, and charges extra for Premium Support. Advanced Scheduling add-on (price not published), AI Notetaker add-on (price not published), Additional sourcing email lookups (paid add-on, price not published), Candidate Data Enrichment add-on (price not published), Advanced Diversity Analytics add-on (price not published), Additional candidate texting messages: $90 per 1,000	$300/mo	Quote only
CapabilitiesBoth run structured hiring with scheduling, sourcing, CRM and reporting. Ashby adds multi-step email and LinkedIn outreach; Greenhouse adds onboarding, Voice AI first-round interviews and identity verification. ATS, Sourcing & CRM, Scheduling, Analytics	11 of 12 core capabilities	11 of 12 core capabilities
IntegrationsGreenhouse counts 451 partner listings and documents several APIs with webhooks. Ashby lists 250 integrations and an API. 451	250 native	451 native
SecurityBoth publish a SOC 2 Type 2 report and support SSO. Greenhouse also states ISO 27001 certification and SCIM provisioning. Yes	SOC 2	SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR

Key differences

Where Ashby and Greenhouse differ (8)
Attribute	Ashby	Greenhouse
Pricing model	Tiered plans	Quote only
Price transparency	Partly published	Quote only
Single sign-on	SAML, OIDC, Google Workspace, Office 365	SAML 2.0, Preconfigured: Okta, OneLogin, Google, Microsoft Entra ID
Native integrations	250	451
Support channels	Email, Customer success team	Support Center requests, Email, In-app live chat, Phone (general inquiries), Account team (Customer Success and Account Management)
Founded	2018	2012
Headquarters	San Francisco, California	New York, NY
Ownership	Private	Private equity-backed

Show 3 attributes where they are the same

Where they are the same (3)
Attribute	Ashby	Greenhouse
Best for	Small businesses, mid-market companies, enterprises	Small businesses, mid-market companies, enterprises
Open API
SOC 2 Type II

Analysis by dimension

Pricing. Ashby publishes Foundations by company size, from $300 a month for 1–10 employees, and prices extra texting at $90 per 1,000 messages. Greenhouse quotes every plan by hiring volume and features, and charges extra for Premium Support.

Capabilities. Both run structured hiring with scheduling, sourcing, CRM and reporting. Ashby adds multi-step email and LinkedIn outreach; Greenhouse adds onboarding, Voice AI first-round interviews and identity verification.

Integrations. Greenhouse counts 451 partner listings and documents several APIs with webhooks. Ashby lists 250 integrations and an API.

Security. Both publish a SOC 2 Type 2 report and support SSO. Greenhouse also states ISO 27001 certification and SCIM provisioning.

Neither one?

Workable

Workable has the highest LeadChange Score in Applicant Tracking Systems after excluding these two (9.4/10).

From $299/mo

More Ashby comparisons

More Greenhouse comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is Ashby cheaper than Greenhouse?

Ashby is the only one of the two that publishes a price: Foundations starts at $300 a month for 1–10 employees. Greenhouse quotes every plan, so compare a quote for the same hiring volume.

Who are Ashby's competitors?

Among the applicant tracking systems we review, Ashby shares its category with Greenhouse, Lever, Workable, iCIMS and SmartRecruiters. Against Greenhouse, the main differences are a published entry price and built-in outreach sequences.

Can I move from Greenhouse to Ashby?

Yes. Ashby says it migrates data from Greenhouse or Lever in a day or two.

Does Greenhouse include onboarding?

Yes. Greenhouse sells an onboarding product next to its applicant tracking system. Ashby focuses on hiring: ATS, sourcing, CRM, scheduling and analytics.

Which has more integrations, Ashby or Greenhouse?

Ashby lists 250 integrations and Greenhouse lists 451.

Is Ashby or Greenhouse more secure?

Both Ashby and Greenhouse state SOC 2 Type II. Only Greenhouse states ISO 27001 and GDPR.

Ashby or Greenhouse? Your answer in 3 questions

Your team size, what matters most and your role: see which one fits more of your answers, from verified facts and list prices. Then, if you like, ask to hear from both.

LeadChange may earn a fee when you request pricing through our site or follow a sponsored link. Rankings never depend on whether a vendor pays us.We may earn a fee.

Get my answer

We may earn a fee.